Paul Deotto
Once upon a time
Bertolaso: we do not have written "hot" deliberately. It was necessary to allow time to time and it took only a few days because it starts to manifest itself yet another farce, plus with that dash of sex which has now become a fixed idea in the political-judicial proceedings. Yes, I wrote his "political-legal" because it is hypocritical to continue to at least pretend to believe in clear, indisputable, separation of the two worlds. Nor does it mean that I accuse prosecutors of acting for political activism, rather than justice. Simply confining to mere observation of events, I see too many cases that go to influence policy, and, in general, with nothing to conclude, because there is nothing to be concluded. From the tragicomedy of "Clean Hands" (I never understood what kind of soap ...), the action of a former (thank God) magistrate as Mr. De Magistris, who managed to appear in newspapers and television stations, without one, a true, its investigations has led to a trial, our news is full of judges "star", you make a reputation with investigations involving big names. The fact that these investigations have then, or not, the foundation, seems to have become quite secondary.
Ciò detto, torniamo a Bertolaso. A un certo punto scopriamo, visto che la cosiddetta privacy esiste solo per utenti selezionati, che uno degli uomini più amati d’Italia, che ha risolto tragiche emergenze, che ha organizzato
Now, there would be nothing to wonder if some of Bertolaso \u200b\u200bemployee had taken advantage of emergency situations for pocketing bribes. Corruption is no longer an evil ineradicable. And then you could be charged to Bertolaso \u200b\u200bto have exercised little oversight of his subordinates. But let's look at another fact: the head of Civil Defence has faced, and above all to solve, dramatic emergencies, and did so with a speed that was unthinkable in Italy that this could take years for the earthquake victims in containers, or who had managed to turn Naples into a dustbin in the sky. In these situations it is understandable that the urgency is first of all, and if some disloyal employee has betrayed the trust, it is fair that you pay.
But only the unconscious, that Italy do not care, can continue to demand the resignation of Bertolaso. Only under a "notice of" a precious man, who has done invaluable work, it should go?
Apart from the presumption of innocence, another pillar of the law, but valid only when it suits, apart from the disconcerting ease with which a meal is given in the press and television news to you, apart from this, only those who are completely hypocritical can get excited for a "notice of". A notice of a commodity that now is not denied to anyone. Born just to secure the suspect, has become the gridiron on which to cook their opponents. A Di Pietro, another chance for ex magistrate, on the basis of a notice demands the resignation of Bertolaso. And what is worse, Bersani (which on other occasions had given demonstrations of common sense) is now his, and the party (or what purports to be) that it represents, this absurd request. A left at the barrel of gas is increasingly in the hands of justice-hypocrites to the TSO by the frantic destruction of the opponent. Completely devoid of a political and identity, the left field only on the fight to Berlusconi. And a man like Bertolaso, which is not a politician, but it is also the best expression of an efficient way of doing politics, stands out if needed, but designed to solve problems, could be the ideal victim. I say "might" because Berlusconi has rejected the resignation, nor Bertolaso \u200b\u200bseems willing to get muddy.
Ma quando questa ennesima buffonata sarà finita, chi risarcirà Bertolaso? Nessuno, perché, e questa è davvero una piaga nell’ex Patria del Diritto, il magistrato è l’unico impiegato statale che sa di agire nella totale impunità. Né voglio, lo ribadisco, immaginare una intenzionalità nel colpire Tizio o Caio per ragioni che non siano di giustizia. Ma esiste anche l’atteggiamento colposo, quello la legge definisce causato da “imperizia, imprudenza o negligenza”. Ed è davvero arduo non vedere almeno l’imprudenza nel gettare fango su un galantuomo, così come non è difficile vedere negligenza nella allegra diffusione di notizie dalle Procure.
Ormai è difficile distinguere tra ANM e CSM. La prima è una semplice associazione, il secondo un organo istituzionale. Ma entrambi si sono arroccati in una assurda difesa dei privilegi di casta, che non fa che danneggiare l’immagine della magistratura e la fiducia dei cittadini nella Giustizia. Prima di agitarsi per un attentato alla indipendenza della magistratura, sarebbe bene ricordarsi che l’indipendenza non è arbitrio. Prima di gridare alla catastrofe della Giustizia, sarebbe bene riflettere che un ddl che prevede come durata massima di un processo sei (dicasi SEI) anni è una garanzia di civiltà per tutti, che non può that also benefit the prestige of the judiciary. And before the deluge of phone tapping, heralded the public really does not help the prestige of the judiciary the great lament for the attempt to limit the use of this form of investigation, with warnings like, "it destroys the possibility of investigation!" and the like. A few days ago a distinguished jurist, an expert on criminal procedure in force in the United States, explained to me that in that country interception can be admitted in court only in support of evidence and real, depending on which you request the indictment of the suspect . A process that arises from interception activities is simply impossible, prohibited by law.
Of course, we must work harder ...
and a left that wants to recover a minimum of face should realize that the ordinary citizen is in Italy now totally distrust of Justice. The process of biblical times, as opposed to the lightning with which there are investigations into celebrities, that bring notoriety, make the civil justice increasingly arbitration is invoked, while in many criminal offenses so-called minor (but less up to a certain point for those who suffer) not are not even reported. So much so, says the average citizen, I need to make a complaint? And then a left that really had at heart the good of the country would run into serious dialogue with the majority, because the disaster of Justice is under the eyes of all, because a country that no longer has confidence in justice is a country in decay.
But the opposition now suffers from a delusion systematized that what emanates from Berlusconi and his government is to destroy. Everything else does not exist, especially not exist in Italy, and its good.
Meanwhile, a Justice in disarray from space to the ravings of a reporting Ciancimino now (as it has never done before?) That his daddy, who died for several years, told him that Forza Italy was born from an agreement between the State and the mafia. Apart from that it would imply that he agreed with the Mafia and Scalfaro Ciampi (who represented the state when he was born Forza Italy), the fact remains that the country's law would not have even accepted a "testimony" completely unrelated to the purpose of the process in progress. But now we are in the former homeland
could miss the comment of Di Pietro, jubilant in saying that "they" had always said? Di Pietro has every right to shell the batch number. The tragedy is that this person has heard and believed in the opposition. And a healthy country would need a serious opposition, who could develop, where necessary, an alternative political project, not a herd of forcaioli who judge and condemn on the basis of notices of investigation or on the basis of the tales of a dead father to imagine son of a figure.
The situation is more dramatic that it is perfectly useless to hide it. No one is allowed to say that recent events have been court "wanted" right now, but the timing with the election campaign for local elections, which could be a massacre for
Chi sarà il prossimo? Maroni? O Brunetta? O Tremonti? Ai posteri l’ardua sentenza.
PS: non mi sono soffermato sulle interessanti disquisizioni circa l’attività sessuale Bertolaso. This investigation of sexual fury began sincerely to give me nausea.
0 comments:
Post a Comment